|
|
|
Top Insurance Stories
in 2007 in East
New leaders tackled old issues and the region battled fire and rain.
1. No day at the beach
Insurance markets for coastal properties continued to challenge
insurers, agents, policymakers and property owners, despite an inactive
hurricane season. For the most part, while policymakers debated, private
markets went about their business.
Insurers writing in the Atlantic and New England states boosted premiums
for coastal homes and began requiring owners to modify their homes to
prevent storm damage or dropped insureds altogether. Carriers also
expanded their definitions of hurricane risk to encompass homes miles
from the coast.
In Connecticut, agents fielded complaints from coastal home owners who
were told they had to install storm shutters. Most felt these steps were
reasonable, but Attorney General Richard Blumenthal drafted legislation
to block insurers from requiring shutters as a condition of insurance.
Maryland lawmakers dabbled with the idea of requiring insurers writing
anywhere in the state to write in all areas -- including the coast --
but eventually rejected the idea.
For the second year in a row, the Massachusetts FAIR Plan requested a 25
percent rate increase for Cape Cod home insurance premiums.
Massachusetts insured coastal properties are valued cumulatively at
around $700 billion. Only three other states —Florida, New York, and
Texas — are at greater financial risk in this regard.
Rhode Island prepped for the worst hurricane to ever crash into New
England — on paper at least. About 250 federal emergency management
officials staged a response to the fictional "Hurricane Yvette," from a
"storm center" in Providence. The leaders of a special Rhode Island
House commission introduced legislation aimed at protecting coastal
homeowners from "unreasonable" rate hikes or from having their policies
canceled because of their location near a coast.
New York lawmakers heard from constituents and agents, especially on
Long Island, that the already tight coastal market was getting tighter.
Insurance companies claimed the market was fine and urged public
officials to refrain from intervening, but agents called for action,
including making permanent the state's residual property insurer, the
New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association
Insurance Journal - December 31, 2007
2nd LI county passes
``social host'' law aimed at underage drinking
It is now a crime for adults living on Long Island to let other people's
children drink in their homes.
Suffolk County Executive Steve Levy has signed into law "social host"
legislation that makes it illegal for homeowners or renters 18 and older
to knowingly allow underage drinking.
Nassau County enacted a similar law in July.
Newsday - December 30, 2007
Brokers Challenged To
Adapt With New Compensation Incentives
Despite the recent controversy over contingent commissions, consultants
believe incentive payments play an important role in the insurance
industry in promoting a company’s interests and helping a carrier to
differentiate itself from its peers.
In a Webcast last week entitled “Contingent Commissions: Growth and
Distribution for Insurance Companies,” members of Deloitte Consulting
discussed contingent commissions and why they remain an important sales
tool for the industry.
Howard Mills, chief advisor for the firm’s insurance industry group, and
former New York insurance superintendent, said the primary concern among
regulators when it comes to contingent commissions is transparency.
“Regulators want to know insurers have their client’s interests at
heart,” he said.
Edward S. Koral, senior manager with Deloitte Consulting, said the
controversy that developed over contingent commissions following
allegations of bid-rigging turned out to be a good thing on one
level--it created a healthy dialogue about the purpose of contingents
and the service brokers provide.
However, some brokers are still dealing with the loss of contingent fee
income as part of settlements with regulators and state attorneys
general, which has had a negative effect with the loss of revenues and
jobs. Some continue to look at consolidating operations or divesting
portions of their firms, he added.
While an unlevel playing field exists, because most brokerages still
accept contingency fees, there does not appear to be any move being made
to ban such compensation altogether, noted Mr. Koral.
In fact, he said there is evidence that some carriers that once shied
away from contingents are now moving back toward the idea. The real
challenge is maximizing disclosure and minimizing any pontential
conflicts of interest.
“You can find a conflict of interest in anything. It’s just a question
of how you manage it,” he observed.
Contingents are a force for motivation and influencing a carrier’s
strategic goals, according to Michael Vaccaro, senior manager with
Deloitte.
The loss of contingents lessens a carrier’s leverage with a producer,
and limits a carrier’s ability to differentiate itself from its peers,
he said. Taking incentives away, he continued, actually hurts the
relationship with producers and denies the carrier the ability to “drive
strategic behavior in the marketplace.”
National Underwriter - November 27, 2007
President Signs TRIA
President Bush today signed the Terrorism Risk
Insurance Act extending the federal backstop on terrorism risk insurance
until the end of 2014.
The bill (H.R. 2761 – The Terrorism Risk Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2007) extends the current program through 2014
and adds coverage of domestic terrorist events to the program.
The bill, passed by the Senate on Nov. 16, was passed by the House on
Dec. 18 after an acrimonious floor debate during which the Democratic
leadership of the House railed against the lack of communication that
body had with the Senate—and vowed to revisit the issue in 2008.
Specifically, during that debate, Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., announced
he was introducing legislation designed to increase terrorism risk
insurance capacity for properties in urban areas seen as prime terrorism
targets where there is currently a shortage of such capacity available,
even with the current TRIA program in place, the so-called “reset”
provision.
That provision was in the bill passed by the House but eliminated from
the Senate version, and will be the subject of House Financial Services
Committee hearings next year, according to Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass.,
chairman of that committee.
National Underwriter - December 26, 2007
Insurable Interests and
Interests Insured in Property Insurance
John Doe and three partners purchased a building for $100,000. Each
partner had an equal $25,000 ownership. Mr. Doe took out a property
policy to insure the building, and his name appears as sole named
insured. No other interests are identified in the policy. The building
burns, fire is an insured peril, and the loss is considered total.
The insurance adjuster agrees the value of the loss is $100,000. Mr. Doe
receives a $25,000 settlement check from the insurer. Whether the policy
limit was $25,000 or $100,000, has Doe received an equitable settlement
from the insurer? Yes, as his insurable interest in the building was
$25,000: 25 percent of $100,000.
What about the three other partners? Unless each was a named insured in
this property policy, there would be no coverage for them. While they
did have an insurable interest in the building, their interests were not
identified—only John Doe appeared as a named insured. Could this
situation happen? Yes.
Many risk management professionals spend considerable time on coverage
comparison and premium negotiation but spend insufficient time
understanding the appropriate interests to be insured in a property
policy. Since Doe had insured the building for $100,000, he and his
partners may attempt to convince the insurer to correct the policy and
add the other interests after the loss. The insurer may take the
position that it underwrites not only the pre-loss exposure
characteristics of the building (i.e., construction, occupancy,
protection) but the moral character of the owners as well. An attempt to
reform the policy after loss is an arduous, expensive task and one ripe
for failure. In this example, let's assume the three partners are left
uninsured due to lack of named insured status. How did this happen? Mr.
Doe and partners forgot to think of the "who" when building insurance
was first considered.
IRMI -
December 2007
Car Hit By Ice? You Might
Have to Pay for Repair: Since Drivers of Vehicles Shedding Missiles
Often Don't Stop, It Can Be Impossible to Bill Them.
Allison Shupp felt like a victim twice this week.
First, a chunk of ice broke off the roof of a van and
smashed into the windshield of her 2005 Nissan Altima on Monday as she
drove east on Route 22 in Bethlehem.
Then, she learned she might have to pay for part of the damage.
Her insurance company is investigating the accident, said Shupp, of
Catasauqua. For now, she must pay the deductible on her insurance
policy, which will cover the rest of the cost of repairs.
Damage done by flying ice often isn't like damage from other kinds of
auto accidents. Normally, both drivers involved in a crash stay at the
scene and a police report can determine who was at fault. That driver's
insurance would then cover the damages.
But when the damage is caused by flying ice, the driver at fault might
not even know an accident has happened, said Rosanne Placey, a
spokeswoman for the Pennsylvania Department of Insurance.
"Sometimes, they really don't know," Placey said, "[or] they don't care
and they just keep moving on."
Allentown Morning Call - Dcember 21, 2007
Coastal Homeowners
Insurance – The Capacity Crunch
As the property/casualty market overall softens, the market for
homeowners insurance in coastal areas has gone in the opposite
direction. The active hurricane seasons of 2004 and 2005 changed the
playbook for insurers with respect to covering homes in areas at risk
for hurricanes. But for insurance purposes, these homes are no longer
only located along the Gulf Coast, or in Florida, or even in the
Carolinas. Now coastal homes all the way up to New England are
considered at risk.
Insurers have taken several measures to reduce their exposure in these
areas, and that has led to some disruption in the marketplace. Consumers
are having their existing coverage non-renewed and are seeing their
premiums rise significantly when they seek coverage elsewhere. Agents
are having difficulty securing markets and are left to explain the
current realities of the marketplace to their customers, and legislators
and regulators, after hearing complaints from the public, are taking a
variety of measures in an attempt to solve what many of them consider a
crisis.
Insurance Advocate gathered representatives from different interests
within the insurance industry, from analysts, to agents, to insurance
companies. Just as Insurance Advocate addresses national issues from a
regional perspective, this roundtable panel discussed the national issue
of covering hurricanes and other disasters, and also the effects of the
current market on the tri-state region.
Additionally, we have included results from a coastal homeowners survey
conducted in October, in which we asked our readers some general
questions about the state of the market.
Insurance Advocate - December 21, 2007
Allstate policy reversal
requires homeowners to drop lawsuits
The agreement between Allstate insurance and state insurance regulators
announced earlier this week is a victory for consumers.
It allows homeowners who had Allstate insurance, but were dropped by the
insurer because they didn't have other lines of insurance, like auto,
with Allstate to renew their old policies.
But there's a snag. The 55,000 New Yorkers eligible for new policies
with Allstate will have to give up their right to sue the insurance
giant. Two class-action lawsuits, both filed in September, seek cash
payouts. Allstate, the largest homeowner insurer in the state, has about
25 percent of the market on Long Island.
"Consumers should be aware that by accepting this offer they will be
releasing Allstate from any legal claims that they could have brought
against the company for the termination of their earlier coverage,"
state insurance superintendent Eric Dinallo said in a statement.
In August, the Insurance Department issued a legal opinion that
concluded Allstate's practice was illegal.
Regulators ordered Allstate and insurer Liberty Mutual to immediately
end the practice or face civil penalties.
Plaintiffs in both lawsuits jumped on the Insurance Department's ruling
as grounds for filing suit against Allstate.
Newsday - December 21, 2007
Nassau County Fraud Sweep
Fingers 8 for Fraud
Eight suspects who allegedly committed more than $938,000 in workers’
compensation fraud against The New York State Insurance Fund (NYSIF)
were part of a Nassau County fraud sweep announced on Monday following a
year-long investigation by NYSIF, the Workers’ Compensation Board, the
New York State Insurance Department and Nassau District Attorney
Kathleen Rice.
Authorities took six suspects into custody on December 17: Scott
Edvabsky, 37, of Levitown; Denise Betts, 47, of Farmingdale; Steven
Wienckowski, 41, of Sound Beach; Vincent Catala, 41, of Syosset; Anthony
Barbera, 38, of Huntington, and Richard Cosgrove, 53, of Bellrose. DA
Rice issued arrest warrants for Costas Hatzinkontos, 41, of Astoria, and
Jose Giron, 28, of Brentwood.
Charges against the suspects vary, ranging from grand larceny and
insurance fraud, to offering a false instrument for filing, criminal
possession of a forged instrument, falsifying business records, perjury,
and violation of the Workers’ Compensation Law – all felonies
NYSIF - December 19, 2007
MARBLE HILL SECTION OF THE
BRONX IS ACTUALLY PART OF NEW YORK COUNTY; VENUE MOTION GRANTED
Montesano v. New York City Housing Auth. 2007 NY Slip Op 09955
Decided on December 18, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department
ullivan, J.
The First Department has informed the Bar as to something that readers
of the New York trivia website www.forgotten-ny.com already know: that
Marble Hill, a neighborhood which is geographically located in the
Bronx, is legally part of New York County.
"This appeal," wrote the Court, "from the denial of defendant's motion
for a change of venue from Bronx County to New York County, presents the
issue, the subject of a long-simmering dispute, of whether the area
known as Marble Hill is legally part of New York County, as defendant
contends, or Bronx County, as plaintiff argues. "
Rogak Report -
December 20, 2007
S&P Takes Action Against 6
Bond Insurers
Standard & Poor’s Rating Service took ratings action against six bond
insurers affected by the subprime mortgage crisis, and Moody’s announced
that it placed subsidiaries of XL Insurance on review for possible
downgrade.
Yesterday, S&P said it took the actions because of “worsening
expectation for the performance of insurance nonprime residential
mortgage-backed securities and CDOs (collateralized debt obligation) of
asset-backed securities.”
The rating service said the six are expected to see claims and/or suffer
rating downgrades that will affect their capital resources, making those
resources insufficient at the current rating level.
There is also concern, S&P continued, that should any of the companies
suffer a capital shortfall, they be able to raise capital or have a plan
in place to do so.
ACA Financial Guaranty Corp. had its financial strength rating dropped
from “A/Watch-Negative” to “triple-C/Watch-Negative”
Ambac Assurance Corp. found its financial strength rating of “triple-A”
move from stable to negative.
The “triple-A” financial strength rating of Financial Guaranty Insurance
Co. and FGIC U.K. Ltd. was placed on “credit watch negative” from
stable.
MBIA Insurance Corp. and XL Capital Assurance “triple-A” ratings moved
from stable to negative.
MBIA reacted to the news saying it was pleased S&P affirmed the
company’s rating and that it is working on a capital management plan
that will return the company to a stable outlook.
National Underwriter - December 20, 2007
Minivan Fender-Benders Can Be
Costly
A minor fender-bender in a minivan can rack up thousands of dollars in
repair costs, according to new crash tests conducted by the insurance
industry.
Repairing damages to minivans involved in low-speed crashes of 3 to 6
miles per hour could range from $483 to more than $3,500, according to
test results released Thursday by the Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety.
The institute conducted a series of four low-speed crashes on six 2008
minivans.
The Nissan Quest had the most expensive bill for the minivans, costing
$3,549 for a low-speed crash to the rear bumper. In the four tests, the
Quest tallied $8,102 in combined damages.
The Dodge Grand Caravan had the lowest costs in one of the four tests,
$483 for damage to the rear corner of the minivan. In all four tests,
the Grand Caravan had a combined $5,495 in damages.
The Honda Odyssey had the lowest combined repair costs of $5,258 in the
four tests. The Toyota Sienna cost $5,726 in repairs for all the tests,
while the Chevrolet Uplander had $5,799 in expenses. The tests estimated
$6,525 in damages to the Kia Sedona.
Tailgates on five of the six minivans -- except the Uplander -- had
damage in the rear full-width test. Only the Quest and the Sienna
required the tailgate to be replaced.
NY Newsday - December 20, 2007
Bush Gets Terrorism Insurance
Extension Bill to Sign
The U.S. House of Representatives has passed an extension to the
Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) by a vote of 360 to 53 in a form
closer to what the Bush Administration and the Senate would support than
to an original House measure.
The legislation will extend TRIA for seven years and, its backers say,
help spur the further development of a private market for terrorism risk
insurance.
TRIA is now set to expire at the end of 2007 unless Congress acts again
to extend the law. The measure will now be sent to President Bush for
his signature and it is expected that he will sign the bill into law
later this week.
The House legislation is the Senate amendment to HR 2761 (original House
TRIA bill) and includes the following provisions:
* Domestic Acts of Terrorism: Incorporates domestic acts of terrorism;
* Duration: Extends TRIA for 7 years;
* Annual Liability Cap: Clarifies the $100 billion cap; requires
Treasury to provide notice to Congress and promulgate regulations
regarding the cap;
* Recoupment: Accelerates the timing of mandatory recoupment (recovering
amounts paid by Treasury up to $27.5 billion); and
* Reports: Requires GAO studies of (1) insurance for nuclear,
biological, chemical, and radiological terrorist events and (2)
availability and affordability of terrorism insurance in specific
markets.
Insurance Journal - December 19, 2007
Underwriting Deterioration
Eating Into P-C Profits
The property-casualty insurance industry should once again show solid
profits this year, but there are signs that underwriting gains are
beginning to deteriorate, according to the latest survey of
industry-wide results.
The figures were gathered by ISO and the Property Casualty Insurers
Association of America and are consolidated estimates representing 96
percent of all business written by private U.S. p-c insurers.
Through the first nine months of 2007, p-c industry net income after
taxes rose more than 7 percent compared to the same period for 2006,
from $46.1 billion to $49.4 billion, according to the report.
The results, the groups said, were fueled by the industry’s net income,
policyholders’ surplus (the insurer’s net worth measured according to
Statutory Accounting Principles) that increased 7 percent, or $35.6
billion, to $521.8 billion.
However, the survey found some slippage in overall profitability
measured by its annualized rate of return on average policyholder
surplus that fell from 13.8 percent to 13.1 percent. Net gains on
underwriting dropped 25.3 percent from $24.3 billion for the first nine
months of 2006 to $18.1 billion for the 2007 nine-month period.
The combined ratio over the period worsened by 2.3, going from 91.5 over
the first three quarters of 2006 to 93.8 for the first nine months of
2007.
Michael R. Murray, ISO assistant vice president for financial analysis,
pointed out that the industry’s combined ratio of 93.8 is the second
best for the first nine months since 1986. However, he said, for
insurers to reach an average rate of return of 13.9 percent—the
long-term average rate of return for Fortune 500 companies—the p-c
industry’s combined ratio needed to be one point better.
In his commentary on the first nine months, Robert P. Hartwig, president
of the Insurance Information Institute, said the first nine months “are
generally excellent and so far have proven surprisingly resilient” in
the face of the intense competition for business within the industry.
If the underwriting deterioration holds true to form as in past cycles,
however, the industry’s return on equity will bottom out in 2011 at
about 1- or 2 percent, and not become profitable again until 2015 or
2016
National Underwriter - December 19, 2007
ISO Files Forms To Comply
With New Terror Backstop Law
The Insurance Services Office Inc. said it is filing new forms with
state regulators that will be compliant with changes Congress has made
in extending the law providing government payments to insurers after a
catastrophic terrorism loss.
The Jersey City, N.J.-based ISO said it began today to submit form and
rule filings that revise its terrorism programs in response to the
reauthorization measure approved by Congress yesterday. The president is
expected to sign the bill.
At the end of the year the current law is due to lapse. ISO Senior Vice
President Kevin Thompson, noting the act’s Dec. 31 expiration date, said
ISO has been closely monitoring Congressional action. “We recognize the
need for prompt access to compliant products, and that is why we’ve
geared up to file as quickly as we have.”
The new forms and rules will reflect the extension of the legislation
for an additional seven years; revise the criteria for certification of
an act of terrorism by eliminating the distinction between foreign and
domestic acts; include an additional disclosure requirement; and
reinforce the $100 billion cap on aggregate insured losses, among other
changes.
National Underwriter - December 19, 2007
Insurers
complain ads from Toyota incite fraud
State and national insurance officials say a Toyota Motor Corp. ad
campaign is encouraging viewers to commit fraud.
The amusing ads suggest that drivers eager to buy a new Toyota should
dump their old car by pushing it off the roof of a parking garage,
dropping a steel beam on it, or chopping down a tree so it falls on the
vehicle. In one ad, a family works together to roll a boulder off a
cliff onto their car.
The Insurance Fraud Bureau of Massachusetts and the Coalition Against
Insurance Fraud, a Washington group that includes insurers, law
enforcement officials, and consumer groups, say the unspoken message is
that an insurance settlement from the old car will help pay for the new
Toyota. Both groups have sent letters to Toyota urging the company to
pull the ads. Dennis Jay, the executive director of the Coalition
Against Insurance Fraud, said he believed fraud bureaus in several other
states and some insurers also plan to write Toyota. Toyota has issued no
formal response to the groups.
"No one believes that these commercials alone will entice car owners
into criminal behavior," Jay wrote in a blog on the group's website.
"But there is a growing body of research that suggests an environment
that tolerates acceptance of unethical behavior does influence some
people to act unethically. And these commercials add to that negative
environment."
Daniel Johnston, executive director of the Insurance Fraud Bureau of
Massachusetts, said the only conceivable purpose for destroying your
existing car, rather than simply trading it in, would be to collect
insurance money to pay for a new car.
"Every scene that's described in the ads is a crime," Johnston said.
Boston Globe - December 19, 2007
Questions of Coverage: Snow
Buildup
QUESTION: We have a policyholder with water damage under a Form 3.
Considerable snow built up on his roof and he pulled it down with a rake
and it piled up against his wall. Water melted from the snow pile and
came in through his siding, damaging a side wall and the floor
sheathing. The company raises questions of the water possibly being
surface water and there is more than one incident of melting, with each
day having a thawing and freezing cycle. It is thought that possibly
snow that came off the roof would add to the stack, leaving the
possibility of several occurrences. They also raised the possibility of
lack of coverage by neglect in not removing the snow against the house,
realizing that damage might occur. What are your thoughts?
ANSWER: The benefit of the doubt must go to the insured and provide
coverage for the loss
Claims Magazine - December 18, 2007
Allstate Dropping Out of PCI
Allstate Insurance Company has given its year’s notice
that it will be withdrawing from the Property Casualty Insurers
Association of America as of 2009.
Both Allstate and PCI officials confirmed the decision, saying that
Allstate has decided to do so “because it is well on its way to
insourcing its government relations function, both at the federal and
state level,” according to David Sampson, PCI’s new president and chief
executive officer.
The bylaws of the trade group require that it give a year’s notice of
plans to withdraw, according to both Mr. Sampson and Rich Halberg, an
Allstate spokesman.
“We are members of state-level trade associations and will continue to
utilize them,” Mr. Halberg said.
Allstate is also a founding member and strong support of
ProtecingAmerica.org, a nonprofit organization which is advocating
legislation which would allow states to create tax-free catastrophic
reserve funds. PCI has been resolutely neutral on the issue.
National Underwriter - December 17, 2007
House passes 7-year TRIA extension
The House of Representatives gave its final approval
to a bill that would extend the federal terrorism insurance backstop for
seven years beyond its scheduled Dec. 31 expiration.
The 360-to-53 vote, which came Tuesday afternoon, clears the way for the
measure to go to President Bush for his signature. In addition to
extending the program, the bill calls for allowing the backstop to
respond to catastrophic acts of domestic as well as foreign terrorism.
The measure, initially passed by the Senate last month, is far less
expansive than a measure passed last week by the House. Among other
things, the earlier bill would have added group life insurance to the
lines of insurance covered by the backstop. The White House reiterated
its threat to veto any measure more expansive than the Senate bill.
Business Insurance - December 18, 2007
Study: The Time it Takes to Settle Claims
Impacts Customer Satisfaction
Customer satisfaction weighs heavily on the length of time it takes to
repair damages for auto and homeowners insurance claims, according to a
new industry study. Vehicles and home repairs fixed quicker yield better
customer satisfaction results.
J.D. Power and Associates, headquartered in Westlake Village, Calif.,
studied auto and homeowner insurance claims based on 10,832 responses
from customers who filed claims between August and September of 2007.
The inaugural study measured customer satisfaction with regard to the
claims process examining claims settlement, servicing, first notice of
loss, estimation process, repair process and rental experience.
The firm said two-thirds of the customers' vehicles were fixed and
returned within 14 days. These customers averaged 843 on a 1,000-point
scale of satisfaction. Thirty-six percent of all customers waited longer
than two weeks for their vehicle to be repaired and the
satisfaction-average dropped by 71 points.
The reported overall satisfaction averages among homeowner insurance
customers paralleled the auto customers. When repairs took longer than
initially anticipated, customer satisfaction averages declined.
"It becomes extremely important to manage customer expectations as far
as how long it will take for their vehicle or property to be repaired or
replaced," said Jeremy Bowler, senior director of the insurance practice
at J.D. Power and Associates. "Proactively contacting the customer,
keeping them informed and explaining the process at each step can soften
the impact of a particularly long claim process � enhancing customer
confidence and satisfaction with their insurer."
Another key factor impacting customer satisfaction proved to be the
number of people a customer must interact with throughout the claims
process. Nearly 75 percent of customers contacted their local agency
first. More than one-third of those customers were apparently redirected
to an insurer or transferred to a call center. The study concluded
redirected-customers tend to be much less satisfied with the claims
experience.
Insurance Journal - December 18, 2007
NY: Allstate must allow coastal homeowner
renewals
More than 55,000 coastal residents who were improperly dropped by
Allstate in part because they did not choose to carry the company's car
or life insurance policies will be given a chance to renew their
contracts, state Insurance Superintendent Eric Dinallo said in a
statement Monday.
The announcement follows Dinallo's ruling in August that the practice of
linking a customer's eligibility for homeowners insurance to his choice
of carrier on other policies is illegal.
"Allstate customers improperly denied the chance to renew their policies
now have the right to choose if they want to stay with the company,"
Dinallo said in a statement.
Still, Allstate will continue to try to reduce its concentration of
customers in coastal areas -- something it is legally permitted to do,
Dinallo said. Allstate representatives have said that they plan to
reduce coastal customers nationwide, including in New York, by refusing
to renew some customers' policies.
"Insurance companies must be able to pay their claims when disaster
strikes," Dinallo said. "They have the right ... to act prudently so
their solvency is not threatened."
The issue of nonrenewal of homeowners' policies at both Allstate and
Liberty Mutual was brought into the spotlight in Newsday reports in
August. Liberty Mutual stopped the practice immediately after Dinallo
deemed the practice illegal that month.
Newsday - December 17, 2007
Insurance Department News Release - December 17, 2007
Pre-existing condition
provisions in group and blanket disability policies
STATUTORY REFERENCE: Section 3234 of the Insurance Law (as added by
Chapter 650 of the Laws of 1993)
On June 27, 2007, the Court of Appeals issued a unanimous decision in
Benesowitz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 8 NY3d 661 (2007)1, a
case that construes New York Insurance Law Section 3234(a)(2). That
statute, entitled "Pre-existing condition provisions in group and
blanket disability policies," reads as follows:
(a) Every group or blanket policy issued or issued for delivery in this
state which provides benefits by reason of the disability of the insured
and which includes a pre-existing condition provision shall contain in
substance the following provision or provisions which in the opinion of
the superintendent are more favorable to the members of the group:
(1) In determining whether a pre-existing condition provision applies to
an eligible person, the group or blanket disability policy shall credit
the time the person was previously covered under a previous group or
blanket disability insurance plan or policy or employer-provided
disability benefit arrangement, if the previous coverage was continuous
to a date not more than sixty days prior to the effective date of the
new coverage. The credit shall apply to the extent that the previous
coverage or level of benefits was substantially similar to the new
coverage or level of benefits; and
(2) No pre-existing condition provision shall exclude coverage for a
period in excess of twelve months following the effective date of
coverage for the covered person.
(b) Nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit or restrict an insurer
from utilizing other forms of underwriting for the members of the group
in lieu of, or in addition to, the pre-existing condition provision
described in subsection (a) of this section.
In Benesowitz, the plaintiff, a new employee without previous creditable
NY
Insurance Department Circular Letter - December 14, 2007
The I.I.I. Outlines What
Winter-Related Damage is Covered by Standard Policies
Old Man Winter Arrives Early This Year Wreaking Havoc To Homes,
Businesses and Vehicles
Winter, which officially starts on December 22, has arrived early in
many parts of the country, causing damage to properties and vehicles
from sleet, ice and snow. Wet, heavy snow has caused collapsed roofs,
porches, awnings, carports and outbuildings. A significant amount of
damage has been caused from downed trees and limbs, according to the
Insurance Information Institute (I.I.I.).
Winter storms are the third-largest cause of loss, resulting in about $1
billion in insured losses annually, said the I.I.I. Melting snow can
inflict significant damage to property. From 1987-2006, winter storms
resulted in more than $23 billion in insured losses. In March 1993, a
20-state winter storm caused a whopping $1.7 billion in insured losses.
Standard homeowners and business insurance policies provide coverage for
a wide range of winter-related disasters such as losses incurred due to
burst pipes, wind damage and wind-driven rain as well as damage caused
by downed trees and limbs or other falling objects. Home and business
insurance typically cover for "ice damming"—a condition where water is
unable to drain properly through the gutters and seeps into a house,
damaging ceilings and walls.
Damage to homes caused by flooding is excluded from standard homeowner
policies. Flood insurance is available from the federal government’s
National Flood Insurance Program.
Automobile accidents resulting from slippery weather are covered under a
standard auto insurance policy. Damage to autos from falling branches or
other debris is covered under the comprehensive portion of an auto
policy.
“Homeowners and businessowners who have suffered losses need to contact
their insurance company or agent as soon as possible to start the claims
filing process,” said Jeanne M. Salvatore, senior vice president and
consumer spokesperson for the I.I.I.
With temperatures dropping, it is important to keep pipes from freezing
by keeping your home at least 65 degrees, according to the Institute for
Business & Home Safety (IBHS). The temperature inside the walls where
pipes are located is substantially colder than the walls themselves. A
temperature lower than 65 degrees may not keep the pipes from freezing.
Ideally, the attic should be five to 10 degrees warmer than the outside
air.
“Everyone should know how to shut their water off," said Wendy Rose with
IBHS. “If water freezes and pipes burst, time is of the essence to keep
damage to a minimum and prevent it from becoming a personal financial
disaster.”
III
- December 2007
Despite Increasing Opposition
Industry Insiders Predict Growth in Life Settlement Market
At the 18th annual Executive Conference for the Life Insurance Industry
it was reported that 60% of insurance executives predicted that the
secondary market for life insurance would experience significant growth
in the next five years. In the same poll, only 5% said it would be
smaller and 2% believed it would be the same.
However, more than half (52%) of the group indicated that they would
root out life settlements, and only 36% said they would want to
participate in this growing but controversial industry.
Much of the debate surrounding life settlements is caused by
investor-initiated life insurance or stranger-owned life insurance (STOLI).
Although some insist that the two are not the same, many insurance
players are opposing the practice.
The American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) believes the answer to
curbing STOLIs is to impose a rule in every state that prevents life
insurers from revoking policies after two years. However, critics say
hiding STOLI transactions from insurers for two years will effectively
circumvent the ban.
ACLI also supports the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’
(NAIC) amended Viatical Settlement Model Act that imposes a five-year
ban on the transfer of policies suspected to be STOLI transactions.
North Carolina Insurance Commissioner Jim Long described this as the
best way to make investors wait before they can get their hands on a
policy, but others label it as an all-out attack on the secondary market
that does not address the problem.
Insurance companies also object to the fact that life settlement
companies keep many policies in force. Insurers normally anticipate
about 6% of life insurance policies to lapse as policyholders forget
about them or decide to stop paying the premiums because they don't need
them anymore. Or the insurance provider only pays a relatively small
amount if a policyholder decides to cash out his or her unwanted or
unneeded contract.
Buying policies from owners who would otherwise allow them to lapse – at
about three times that of surrender fees from an insurer – keeps the
number of lapsing policies low. Insurers will therefore have to pay the
coverage amount when the insured dies or is forced to offer surrender
values that are comparable to life settlement market prices.
Economists have said that the life settlement market would be worse than
the current subprime fiasco now that Wall Street firms are buying
unwanted policies, pooling them and using them as collateral to sell the
so-called death bonds to investors looking for uncorrelated investments.
Insurance NewsNet - December 14, 2007
Agent Groups At Odds Over Biggest Problems With
N.Y. Comp Reform Law
Associations cite concerns over enforcement, trust fund, rate cuts
As New York forges ahead to implement this year’s landmark changes in
its new workers’ compensation reform law, the state’s two major
independent agent groups are expressing some serious but conflicting
concerns over issues of enforcement, trust-fund assessments and the
sustainability of recent rate cuts.
The organizations at odds over what to worry about going forward when it
comes to workers’ comp are the Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers
of New York and the Professional Insurance Agents of New York.
Signed into law in March by Democratic Gov. Eliot Spitzer, the measure
called for a host of reforms, including:
• Increased penalties for workers’ comp fraud.
• Higher weekly benefits, both minimum and maximum.
• Objective medical guidelines, to be developed to better determine
disability.
Jamie Deapo, member advocate and assistant vice president of member
programs for IIABNY, questioned a section of the law that involves the
Aggregate Trust Fund.
According to the legislation, carriers that sell workers’ comp in New
York must pay the “present value” of permanent partial disability
benefits into the ATF.
Mr. Deapo noted that insurers paying into the ATF are not eligible for a
refund in the event of an overestimate but must pay more in the event of
an underestimate.
“Imagine you have a younger person that gets a [permanent partial
disability award] and you throw up $200,000 for this gentleman or lady,
and a couple of years later they’re killed in a car accident. You don’t
get any of that money back,” Mr. Deapo explained.
He also questioned the fairness of exempting self-insured trusts and the
New York State Insurance Fund from making these payments while requiring
private carriers to pay into the fund.
However, while Mr. Deapo cited the ATF as one of his biggest issues with
the reforms, David Dickson, past president of the PIANY, does not see it
as a major concern in the long run.
“I would say, with regards to the application of the funds and their
availability, that there is going to be an ‘ironing out’ period,” he
said. “I’m not worried about it. I wouldn’t put [the ATF] as one, two or
three in my list of concerns.”
However, Mr. Dickson has more of an issue with what he characterized as
the state’s failure to enforce laws against misclassification of
employee jobs at less risky levels by businesses, as well as the failure
by some employers to provide proper workers’ comp coverage.
National Underwriter - December 17, 2007
FAILURE TO INFORM INSURER OF CHANGE OF PROPERTY OWNERSHIP HELD NOT
FATAL TO COVERAGE
D.F. Realty LLC et al. v. Security
Mutual Insurance Company et al. 2007 NY Slip Op 52369(U) Decided on
December 12, 2007 Supreme Court, Broome County Lebous, J.
Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking to amend the
name of the insured on a property policy so as to reflect a change of
ownership, so that plaintiff could collect benefits based on a fire at
the insured premises.
On February 19, 1997, Joan F. Dorsey purchased
residential rental property located at 3 Thorpe Street, Binghamton, New
York ("Premises"). On that same date, Ms. Dorsey also secured a
landlord's fire and liability insurance policy from Security Mutual
through defendant Falvo Agency, insuring the Premises with herself as
the named insured for a three year term starting on February 19, 1997
and running through February 19, 2000.
In November 1997, Joan F. Dorsey and her son Lawrence
C. Foster formed D.F. Realty, LLC (the "LLC"). The ownership of the LLC
was divided between Joan F. Dorsey as the majority owner and Lawrence C.
Foster as the minority owner. On December 19, 1997, Joan F.
Dorsey transferred 3 Thorpe Street to the LLC by way of warranty deed.
In late 1997 and early 1998, the LLC encountered
insurance problems relating to the necessity for continuing to carry
workers' compensation coverage. According to plaintiffs, there were
numerous written and oral discussions between Joan F. Dorsey, her agent
Steve Falvo, her attorney Phillip J. Artz, and workers' compensation
officials through which the issue - Mr. Foster's status as an employee
of the LLC - was ultimately resolved.
On February 19, 2000, the Policy was renewed for a
second three year term starting February 19, 2000 through February 19,
2003 ("Renewal No.1"). The premium was paid by the LLC each year of the
renewal period.
Joan F. Dorsey died on July 15, 2000. Two of her five
children, Lawrence C. Foster and Carol J. Guiton, were named
co-executors of her estate. Ms. Dorsey's Last Will and Testament left
her ownership in the LLC to her five children.
On February 19, 2003, the Policy was renewed for a
third three year term starting February 19, 2003 through February 19,
2006 ("Renewal #2"). Again, the premium was paid by the LLC each year
during the renewal period.
On September 22, 2005, fire destroyed the Premises
Rogak Report -
December 13, 2007
Execution of contract triggers
coverage for additional insureds
General contractors and subs should specify when their contractual
relationship begins
If a general contractor fires a subcontractor and hires another
subcontractor to take over the existing work, the question is whether
the new subcontractor’s agreement to name the general contractor as an
additional insured will be recognized by the subcontractor’s insurer if,
at the time of an accident, the contract between the general contractor
and subcontractor was not yet signed.
This actually is a fairly common situation. Sometimes it is not
practical for a contract to be signed before work commences.
Manufacturers that regularly require work by a plumber, electrician,
carpenter, and other service providers commonly require the signing of
purchase order agreements before work can begin. But in an emergency,
the signing of a contract sometimes has to be postponed.
In many other instances, the parties involved have contracted with one
another in the past, have trust in one another, and each knows (or
should know) what his or her respective obligations are likely to be.
Even if the parties to a contract have not contracted with one another
in the past, there is often some oral agreement or implied understanding
as to the contract terms. With time of the essence, project owners,
general contractors and a variety of businesses often permit the
commencement of work, even though the contract has not been signed.
As a matter of principle, a subcontractor’s insurer is likely to refuse
to defend and indemnify the additional insured in the foregoing
scenarios, whether the contract has been signed or not, particularly
when there are no allegations of fault attributable to the
subcontractor.
Apart from that common pattern and practice of denying coverage to the
additional insured, whether a contract has to be signed before
additional insured coverage is activated is a legitimate concern. In
fact, a considerable amount of dialogue currently is being generated in
insurance circles about the requirement of some insurers issuing blanket
additional insured endorsements.
Rough Notes - December 2007
Honda a favorite of car
thieves in Suffolk County
Hondas are hot.
Announcing the results yesterday of a months-long sting targeting motor
vehicle thefts, the Suffolk County district attorney's office said that
of the 92 stolen cars - valued at $1.1 million - it recovered, 37 were
Hondas. The models varied in year, but detectives reported buying as
many as four or five - generally from the 1990s - at a time, officials
said.
The sting began about 16 months ago and is continuing through December.
Other vehicles in the bust ranged from a Hummer to late-model Mazdas,
fresh off the dealership lot.
Detectives, operating out of an undercover garage on Suffolk's South
Shore, purchased the cars at 5 percent to 10 percent of their Blue Book
value, police said. They arrested 22 people, including a fifth-grade
teacher who falsely reported her leased 2005 Cadillac stolen; a
27-year-old Massapequa man who sold his grandfather's 2003 Lexus to
undercover detectives; and a mechanic who made copies of his customers'
keys and then stole their cars.
"Theft rings peddling stolen cars are big business in Suffolk County and
the metropolitan area," District Attorney Thomas Spota said in a
statement, "and this operation found all manner of theft, from insurance
give-ups to cars stolen by a person posing as a customer..."
Nationwide, the two most frequently stolen cars in 2006 were the 1995
Honda Civic and the 1991 Honda Accord, followed by the 1989 Toyota
Camry, according to the nonprofit National Insurance Crime Bureau.
Spokesman Frank Scafidi said their popularity with thieves stems from
their popularity in general and coveted replacement parts.
Newsday - December 12, 2007
Undercover chop shop sting
nets 22 arrests
For the past two years undercover detectives ran a sting operation -- a
fake chop-shop -- at a western Suffolk County garage.
First they bought stolen cars from the thieves. Then they locked them
up.
One suspect is charged with stealing and selling his grandfather's
Lexus, not even bothering to remove his grandmother's wheelchair from
the trunk, prosecutors say.
Another test-drove four cars from dealers' lots then returned to
burglarize the offices, steal the keys and make away with all four
vehicles.
A third suspect was an auto mechanic who made copies of customers' keys
then stole their cars, Suffolk District Attorney Thomas Spota's office
said.
They were among 22 people arrested by undercover detectives in the
sting. They bought 90 stolen cars, trucks and motorcycles from thieves,
Spota's office said, paying five to ten percent of the blue book value
of the vehicles. Some were stolen from car lots and others from owners
who left them unattended with the engine running, prosecutors said.
Spota, police Commissioner Richard Dormer and Frank Orlando, director of
the state Insurance Frauds Bureau, disclosed details of the sting
Tuesday. It began in 2005 and ended in November.
Altogether, 22 men and women were charged with stealing or reselling the
stolen vehicles, valued at $1.1 million. Thirty-seven of the cars were
90s vintage Hondas stolen for their parts.
Newsday - December 11, 2007
Cunning Auto Insurance Policyholders Take Insurance Industry for 'Ride'
to Tune of Nearly $17 Billion in 2006
Annual Premium Rating Report Released by Quality
Planning Corp. Uncovers Preventable Auto Premium Rating Error That Could
Boost Profit and Reduce Cost of Auto Insurance to Consumers
Quality Planning Corporation (QPC), an ISO company, today released its
annual Premium Rating Error report, which reveals how devious consumers
continue to play a costly role in causing auto premium rating errors.
QPC estimates that, in 2006, premium rating error resulted in the loss
of $16.6 billion of premium revenues -- an increase over the 2005
figure.
The industry's combined $16.6 billion premium rating error represents
nearly 10 percent of the $166 billion revenue recognized by personal
auto insurance premiums industrywide. The report, The Auto Insurance Is
Under Attack, aggregates and summarizes audit results from more than 18
million policies, representing 20 major carriers. The sample includes
substandard to preferred books of business, all distribution channels,
and national and regional carriers.(1)
The report can be found online at:
www.qualityplanning.com
"This report indicates that insurance companies are still missing
opportunities to increase profit," said Raj Bhat, president of QPC.
"Unfortunately, this revenue loss will continue to build, year after
year, unless insurers establish modern and sophisticated premium leakage
detection systems. The good news is that once such a system is
established, insurers can easily reduce premium leakage by 60 percent in
a single policy period."
Consumer fraud: a leading cause of premium rating error
The QPC report shows how different categories of rating errors
contribute to overall premium rating error, and distinguishes between
vehicle rating errors (mileage, usage, type of vehicle, and location)
and driver rating errors such as driving experience and driving record.
The report concludes that rating error is increasing for two primary
reasons: consumer fraud and dynamic risk profiles.
The Internet has greatly contributed to an alarming rise in fraud by
providing consumers with step-by-step instructions that outline exactly
how they can reduce their automobile insurance, bilking the insurance
industry of legitimate premium revenue. Such sites offer 'advice' that
encourages policyholders to switch companies and coaches them on how to
get the lowest quote from a competitor. Insurers need to adopt
methodologies to safeguard themselves against these cunning
co-conspirators.
Marketwire -
December 12, 2007
N.J. Senate Passes Agent-Friendly Auto
Insurance Changes
New Jersey insurance agents would no longer be required to offer auto
insurance quotes from all of their companies under a bill recently
passed by the state's legislature.
The bill, which carries the backing of both the Professional Insurance
Agents of New Jersey and the Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of
New Jersey, heads to the desk of Gov. Jon Corzine for his signature.
The bill comes after agents complained the current auto insurance system
in N.J. "places an unnecessary obligation on insurance agents and does
not serve consumers because it fails to take into account all factors
that agents consider when offering coverage options to consumers," said
Jack Lynn, PIANJ president.
Insurance Journal - December 11, 2007
Demystifying Auto Rental Insurance
As the holiday season approaches, Americans everywhere are planning
to go "over the river and through the woods"—maybe to Grandma's, maybe
to kids' homes, maybe to a special, once-a-year vacation spot. And many
of those folks will be flying to their destination, where they will then
rent a car.
If you've ever rented a car at an airport—especially at holiday time—it
can be a frustrating experience. After waiting for what seems like an
eternity for your luggage to show up on the carousel, you then have to
find the car rental office, often not an easy task. (Before going on, I
must give "kudos" to the Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood (FL) International
Airport: there, all of the car rental companies are located in one
building, with specially designated shuttle buses to transport customers
to and from the terminal. It is, by far, the easiest, most convenient
arrangement I've ever come across.)
When you get to the car rental counter, you often wait in a very long
line, while the overworked clerks at the other end do their best to get
each and every customer into the car of their choice. Part of that
process is explaining the cost (and any associated "overage" charges);
the gas tank fill-up policy; and, maybe most importantly, the
"insurance" offered by the rental company. This insurance is usually
referred to as collision damage waiver (CDW) or loss damage waiver (LDW),
and that "insurance" can often be complicated and costly.
However, before looking at what the car rental companies offer, and what
their contracts require of the renter, this column will examine the
coverage for rental cars provided by the personal auto policy (PAP).
Rental Cars and the PAP
The first question that many PAP customers ask their agent is this: "If
I'm driving a rental car and have an accident where I hurt someone, am I
covered?" The simple, direct, and (most importantly) correct answer is:
"Yes." The liability insuring agreement of the PAP says that the named
insured and his or her family members have coverage for the "ownership,
maintenance, or use" of "any auto or trailer."
"Any" is the operative word here. Of course, there are some exclusions,
but those come up in rare cases. We will be dealing with the typical,
vacation car-rental situation—where the PAP named insured rents a car
for a week or so of vacation fun. Consider John and Mary Smith, who have
a PAP that covers their 2006 Toyota Prius for liability, medical
payments, uninsured motorists, collision, and other-than-collision. They
fly to Southern California for 2 weeks of fun in the sun at
Christmastime. They rent a car from any one of the myriad of car rental
companies, and off they go. On the way to the hotel, John runs a red
light and hits another car. John and Mary are unhurt, but the elderly
driver of the other car must be taken to the hospital. If that injured
driver sues John over his injuries, John's PAP will provide him with
liability coverage and a defense.
IRMI
- December 2007
Risk Management: Protecting
Assets When Home Ownership Is Transferred to a Trust
It is becoming more and more popular with estate planning attorneys
to try to reduce estate taxes on tangible property by transferring
ownership of that property from an individual to a trustee of a trust.
In the case of a residence ownership transfer, the former homeowner, the
"grantor" of the trust, is usually allowed to continue to reside at the
residence and use the personal property at his discretion for life.
However, what may be a good move for estate preservation from taxes
exposes the entire estate to some serious potential uninsured claims.
Bill and Mary's Story
Bill and Mary, in their mid-50s, have been through an estate planning
session with their attorney. He has recommended that they transfer
ownership of their $5 million in assets, including their $2 million home
and their estimated $1 million in personal property including artwork, a
sailboat, and canoe—to a trust in their name. They follow his advice and
do the deal. They appoint Mary's brother, Joe, as trustee of the trust.
No changes are made to any of the insurance policies. The named insured
listed on the homeowners and umbrella policies remains Bill and Mary.
The following claims occur.
As the result of a defective electrical circuit, the house burns down,
destroying the building and all contents. The replacement cost of the
property is $3 million—the same as the insurance coverage. The insurance
adjuster, when delivering the $3 million check, requests a copy of the
title. When the adjuster sees that the title is in the name of Joe as
trustee of the trust and, on further investigation, discovers in the
trust documents that the household personal property is also owned by
the trust, the adjuster rips up the check.
The Reason? Neither the trust nor trustee is an "insured" under the
homeowners policy definitions. Therefore, the trust property ownership
of the home and personal property is completely uninsured, and Joe and
Mary probably will get paid only for the economic value of their
insurable interest—the additional living expenses for renting a fully
furnished home. The value of the estate including the trust assets,
however, has just been reduced by $3 million!
IRMI - December 2007
Workers' Compensation Board Recommends New
Funding Model to Guarantee Self-insured Claims
New York State Workers' Compensation Board Chair
Zachary S. Weiss issued a report to Governor Spitzer and the Legislature
proposing sweeping changes to the way self-insured claims are secured in
New York.
If enacted into law, a new funding model would be created, resulting in
the release of the nearly $2 billion in letters of credit and surety
bonds back to New York's active individual self-insured employers. View
the report
"This is another positive step in Governor Spitzer's workers'
compensation reform initiative. It will protect injured workers, reduce
financial burdens on creditworthy self-insurers, and help to keep
self-insurance as a viable option for employers in New York," Chairman
Weiss said. "We look forward to working with the legislature and other
affected stakeholders to achieve meaningful reform in this area."
In the report, the Board recommends adopting a new model for
guaranteeing self-insured claims. The Board recommends replacing the
current "silo" approach, where employers post a security deposit
equivalent to their outstanding workers' compensation claims with a
"guarantee pool," where payments into the pool are based on credit
rating and the actual risk an employer brings to the pool. The proposed
pool system would be used to guarantee claims in the event any of New
York's self-insured employers default on their workers' compensation
obligations.
"Self-insurance is a privilege, not a right. When a self-insurer
defaults on its obligations, this poses an unacceptable risk that
benefits will not be paid in a timely manner to injured workers, and
that other employers within the self-insurance program will be subjected
to unexpected financial stress," Chairman Weiss said. "The recommended
pooled approach will reduce the risk of insolvencies within the
self-insurance program and mitigate the consequences of those
insolvencies that do occur. In addition, it will eliminate the security
most employers must post to be authorized as an active self-insurer in
New York State."
The 2007 Workers' Compensation Reform Bill directed the Board to
recommend a new bond program for "individual" self-insured employers.
The report does not address other types of self-insurance, such as group
trusts or municipal programs, although it notes that some of the tools
recommended in the report for individual self-insurance also could
address issues with group trusts.
New York requires employers to provide workers' compensation coverage
through one of three ways: an insurance carrier, the State Insurance
Fund, or through self-insurance. There are 150 parent companies approved
as individual self-insurers in New York. They bring 285 subsidiaries
into the program for a total of 435. These companies have 525,000
employees in New York alone, with a combined annual payroll of $27
billion.The Board holds $1.8 billion in security deposits for these
active self-insurers and an additional $800 million for inactive
self-insurers. It is estimated that these employers collectively pay $33
million annually to meet the Board's security deposit requirements.
NY State Compensation Board - December 10, 2007
Public Comments Invited on
Proposed New and Revised Board Forms
The Workers’ Compensation Board invites the public to submit comments on
draft revisions of its three primary claim forms and two new forms by
visiting http://www.wcb.state.ny.us
from December 10, 2007, through January 11, 2008.
Forms C-2, C-3, and C-4 are filled out by New York’s employers, injured
workers and doctors, respectively, to report a workplace injury or
illness. The public is also invited to review two additional forms: Form
C-3.3, which allows claimants to authorize the release of medical
information by health care providers, and Form C-4.2, the treating
doctor’s continuing/final report. The revised C-4 will be used for the
doctor’s initial report only.
NY State Compensation Board - December 10, 2007
WHEN THERE IS
MORE THAN ONE INSURED, NOTICE OF PHOTO INSPECTION REQUIREMENT MUST BE
SENT TO ALL
Wright and Jennings v. Progressive Northeastern Ins. Co. and DCAP
Bayside Inc. 2007 NY Slip Op 52315(U) Decided on November 29, 2007
Supreme Court, Queens County Weiss, J.
In April 2006, plaintiffs Jamila Z. Wright and Claudette Jennings
purchased a 2002 Lexus automobile for $28,000. The plaintiffs applied
for insurance through defendant DCAP Bayside, Inc., an insurance broker,
which alleged that it informed them that they had to obtain a photo
inspection of the vehicle in order to have coverage for "physical
damage," including theft. The broker allegedly gave the plaintiffs a
notice which read in relevant part: "This notice will also serve as a
reminder that the above described vehicle must be inspected by the date
indicated or physical damage coverage will be suspended 12:01 AM on the
above inspection completed date. ... If you need to have the photo
inspection done please call CARCO at 1-800-969-2272."
Plaintiff Jamila Wright signed a document captioned "Acknowledgment of
Requirement for Photo Inspection," by means of which the plaintiff
admitted that she had been informed of the requirement concerning the
photo inspection and the consequences of a failure to comply. The
defendant insurer also sent by mail to plaintiff Jamila Wright a
confirmation of physical damage coverage with notice of mandatory photo
inspection requirement.
The plaintiffs did not have their vehicle inspected.
On April 25, 2006, defendant Progressive sent plaintiff Wright a
"Confirmation of Suspension of Physical Damage Coverage" notifying her
that coverage had been suspended but could be restored upon compliance
with the inspection requirements. On October 15, 2006, a thief stole the
2002 Lexus automobile owned by plaintiff Jamila Z. Wright and plaintiff
Claudette Jennings. The vehicle was never recovered.
Rogak Report -
December 10, 2007
Workers’ Comp Risk Issues Emerging
While presenting a generally rosy forecast of
underwriting profitability for the property-casualty industry, the
president of the Insurance Information Institute said he has growing
concerns about the workers’ compensation line.
Speaking at a meeting of the Casualty Actuaries of Greater New York here
on Thursday, Robert P. Hartwig, president of New York-based I.I.I.,
suggested that if recent occupational disease studies have merit, the
trends they reveal could impact insurer results going forward.
“I am concerned about latent disease,” Mr. Hartwig said, referring to
cancers or lung disorders developing in workers many years after they
complete their jobs.
“There’s an emerging literature on degenerative neurological diseases
associated with occupation,” he added, noting, for example, that
Parkinson’s disease is highly correlated with people who have certain
occupations. He added that a soon-to-be-released study by the World
Health Organization will show “that people who work the graveyard shift
are more likely to get cancer.”
Mr. Hartwig discussed the emerging issues after describing the dramatic
improvement in workers’ comp calendar-year combined ratios in recent
years. Since 2001, when the National Council of Compensation Insurance
reported an unprofitable 122 combined ratio, insurer fortunes have
reversed, with the ratio dropping to 90.5 in 2006.
National Underwriter - December 10, 2007
DEPARTMENT ADJOURNS DECEMBER
14 HEARING ON SURETY BONDS
On November 2nd, 2007, Superintendent of Insurance Eric R. Dinallo
announced that the New York State Insurance Department would hold a
public hearing to determine whether to require the New York Property
Insurance Underwriting Association (NYPIUA) to provide a market for
surety bonds. The hearing was to be held pursuant to Section 5412 of the
Insurance Law, which authorizes the Superintendent, after conducting a
public hearing, to require NYPIUA to provide a market for meaningful
insurance coverage. The hearing was scheduled on December 14th at the
Adam Clayton Powell Jr., State Office Building in New York City. Notice
of the hearing was published in the New York State Register on November
28, 2007.
This hearing has been adjourned until further notice.
NY State
Insurance Department - December 10, 2007
New York to Study Universal Health
Coverage
Governor Eliot Spitzer of New York announced that the
state has retained the Urban Institute to study several different
approaches to universal health care for the state. The Urban Institute
is a policy research group that will study different proposals and is
required to submit their findings to the Governor by May 31, 2008. In
addition, the state has begun a series of public hearings to discuss
various health care possibilities.
New York instituted the Partnership for Coverage as a policy initiative
to control Medicaid spending. The hearings will be held all over New
York and will encourage business owners, concerned citizens and others
to meet and discuss health insurance for New Yorkers. A list of hearing
dates is available at the Partnership for Coverage website.
About.com - December 5, 2007
Study: Motorists Don't Drive
as Well in Freezing Temperatures
Many American drivers are unsure of proper vehicle operational
procedures when driving in freezing temperatures, according to a survey
conducted by GMAC Insurance and Road Safe America. The survey, which
sampled licensed Americans from all 50 states and the District of
Columbia, indicates that more than one- third of drivers cannot
correctly identify the proper use of cruise control, and nearly
two-thirds underestimate how full they should keep their gas tanks.
Specifically, the survey found that 36 percent of licensed drivers --
approximately 72 million people -- believe it's safe to drive with their
cruise control activated if the temperature is below freezing. However,
the two organizations assert that the safest course of action is to
avoid using cruise control altogether. Despite clear weather,
accumulated moisture on roadways combined with freezing temperatures
could lead to icy conditions, which are sometimes undetectable.
Respondents were also unclear on the minimum amount that should be in a
vehicle's gas tank: 31 percent indicated it didn't matter, four percent
responded one-eighth of a tank, 28 percent answered one-quarter tank and
37 percent said one-half tank. The survey organizers recommend keeping
the gas tank as full as possible but at least half full to maximize the
length of time vehicle occupants can run the engine as a source of heat
in an emergency
Insurance Journal - December 10, 2007
Stratford sued over kite-surfing
death
The widow of a professional skier from Bulgaria who
drowned while kite-surfing off Long Beach West two years ago has filed a
negligence lawsuit against the town in U.S. District Court in
Bridgeport.
Veneta Popow, 37, of Peekskill, N.Y., filed the suit
seeking in excess of $75,000 for the death of her husband, 48-year-old
Stoil Popow on Jan. 21, 2006.
The search for Popow, one of the most intensive ever in the area,
included U.S. Coast Guard helicopters from as far away as Cape Cod and
covered about 260 square miles.
The drowning also touched off worldwide reaction, as people from across
the globe contributed money so the Bulgarian native's wish to be buried
in his homeland could be realized.
U.S. Coast Guard officials said water had apparently filled Popow's dry
suit when his body was discovered about two miles southeast of Stratford
Point.
New York lawyer Mario Biaggi, representing the claimant, said Friday a
key point in the suit is that a short time prior to Popow's death
Stratford officials were forced rescue a man in the same location.
"Our research turned up evidence that another person nearly drowned in
the same spot," Biaggi said. "We believe that should have alerted town
officials to taking precautions to prevent a tragedy they knew could
happen."
ConnPost - December 7, 2007
Lidoderm(R) Unseats OxyContin(R) to
Top The Hartford's New List of Top 25 Drugs Used in Workers'
Compensation
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (NYSE: HIG
- News) released its 2006 annual study of the 25 most costly drugs in
workers’ compensation, and the results this year may be considered
surprising. OxyContin, the long-acting narcotic painkiller that headed
the list each year since 2001, had dropped to number five, replaced by
Lidoderm, a non-narcotic pain killer in patch form.
“We remain concerned about the widespread use of narcotic pain killers
to manage non-malignant pain in injured workers,” said Dr. Robert
Bonner, MD, MPH and medical director for The Hartford. “Narcotics
account for 40 percent of the workers’ compensation claim dollars we
spend on pharmaceuticals, but other pain management drugs and
combinations would work equally well for some patients and avoid the
potential risks associated with narcotics.”
Given OxyContin’s continued popularity in the face of years of publicity
about patients becoming addicted or selling the drug, it is unclear as
to how the use of this drug will trend over the next few years.
One reason The Hartford publishes its annual study is to track
expenditure over time as they impact trends. The Hartford found workers’
compensation pharmacy costs relatively flat for the past two years,
rising just three percent in 2006 after dropping by one percent in 2005.
Bonner credits his team’s careful and aggressive pharmacy oversight.
“Pharmacy is now a big portion of workers’ compensation costs, so
ensuring that the appropriate medications are used is not only good for
our insured workers, but also helps stabilize rates for workers’
compensation, an insurance coverage that virtually every business with
employees must carry,” Dr. Bonner said. “Working with our pharmacy
benefits manager, we flag and investigate drugs that seem inappropriate
for the injury, encourage the use of generic equivalent drugs when
available and talk with physicians when we are concerned about the
safety or reliability of a particular drug.”
Ensuring that the correct reimbursement is made remains a challenge in
the face of steep per-prescription increases. The average per-dose price
of Actiq (#7), already the most expensive drug used for workers’
compensation patients, rose 70 percent, and the anti-depressant Tofranil-PM
(#146), rose by 74 percent.
Yahoo
- December 10, 2007
Will Professional Liability
Insurers Take $19B Hit From Subprime Crisis?
With more experts putting numbers to the possible insurance liability
impact of the subprime mortgage crisis last month, the figures are
starting to mount, with estimates ranging from $3 billion to 10-times
that amount. The first figure—which relates only to potential directors
and officers liability claims—could be dwarfed by $16 billion-plus in
professional liability insurance losses, also known as errors and
omissions insurance, some experts say.
While the latest expert analyses are based on data collected so far,
some forecasters also note that information available to date represents
just the tip of what seemed like a slow moving iceberg back in April,
when National Underwriter first reported on the subject. (See NU, April
2, page 14.)
Then experts were speculating that the subprime crisis would not have
the D&O impact of financial meltdowns like Enron or WorldCom, or even
the lesser impact of options backdating cases.
Now, “the numbers are staggering,” according to Frederick Zauderer,
technical director of Travelers Bond & Financial Products in New York.
National Underwriter - December 10, 2007
NAIC To Develop Federal Bill
To Help Standardize Insurance Regulation
New president says a number of options will be reviewed before going to
Congress
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners will work next year
on a proposal for standardizing insurance regulation nationwide that it
can bring before Congress, according to the group’s new president.
Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, who will lead the NAIC in
2008, emphasized that the effort will enhance state regulation and not
abrogate state authority.
She explained that the NAIC has worked with federal officials on
proposals in the past for issues such as supplementary Medicare
insurance. The state regulator association also worked with the FBI, she
noted, to coordinate a plan for producer licensing records.
A number of approaches will be reviewed and considered during the
commissioners’ annual weekend gathering in February to discuss
standardized regulation, she said.
One proposal was detailed by Texas Insurance Commissioner Michael
Geeslin during the government relations leadership council session here
at the NAIC’s quarterly meeting. He discussed the idea of developing a
model called the “Federal Standardization Act of 2008” in the coming
year as a way to homogenize insurance regulation.
Currently, he explained, insurance is being looked at by different
federal authorities, adding that more standardization is needed.
National Underwriter - December 10, 2007
Hospitals balk at insurer
notification demand
Consumers often must notify their insurer within 24 hours if they visit
a hospital. Now the nation's largest health-insurance company wants the
hospital to call them in 24 hours as well, or lose up to half their
reimbursement.
The proposal by Minnesota-based UnitedHealthcare isn't sitting well with
hospitals in the Lower Hudson Valley, who call the notification rule
another effort to stiff the institutions on payments they've earned.
With lower staffing on weekends, hospitals are unlikely to pick up the
telephone every time there's an emergency admission.
"That's just putting another step in," said Neil Abitabilo, president of
the Northern Metropolitan Hospital Association in Newburgh. "You have no
idea how that helps you take care of that patient."
UnitedHealthcare denies the policy is an effort to circumvent its
responsibility to pay health providers. The insurer's prompt involvement
is in the best interests of the patient, spokesman Tyler Mason said.
"Once you're stabilized in an emergency case, you want to get well and
get out of there," he said.
Several weeks ago UnitedHealthcare notified hospitals around the country
that it planned to impose the policy starting Dec. 3. Now the policy has
been pushed back to April 1, Mason said, after many hospitals said they
needed more time to plan compliance.
Until then, UnitedHealthcare will settle for notification by the next
business day.
Last week the New York State Insurance Department asked UnitedHealthcare
to delay the policy, saying it wanted more time to determine its impact.
LowerHudson - December 10, 2007
Fraud Investigators Brace for Arsons from Subprime
Mortgage Crisis
Insurance fraud investigators are girding for an expected rash of arsons
by cash-strapped homeowners trying to avoid foreclosures and ballooning
monthly payments as the subprime mortgage crisis deepens.
"Home arsons for insurance money by mortgage-burdened owners are hardly
new. The question is whether a new and virulent spike looms," says the
Coalition Against Insurance Fraud.
Falling home values and tighter lending are making it difficult for many
people to finance their way out of trouble. More than $50 billion in
adjustable-rate mortgages were reset last month, thus intensifying the
financial crunch on homeowners, says the coalition's Executive Director
Dennis Jay.
"The subprime mortgage crisis is crushing untold thousands of homeowners
under heavy mortgage payments they can't afford—especially as many
monthly payments adjust upward sharply after introductory teaser periods
of low-interest rates," he writes in an article in its publication,
Fraud Focus.
Only a few suspected home torchings have surfaced so far. Samuel White
allegedly burned down his Houston home for insurance money to dodge a
scheduled foreclosure. An African-American, he allegedly spray-painted
racial slurs around the interior to make the suspected crime appear to
be a hate crime.
Suspected mortgage-related home arsons already have jumped 50 percent
above the 2006 rate in California, though the numbers are still
relatively small, the insurance department says.
Insurance Journal - December 3, 2007
Storm team predicts seven
hurricanes in 2008
In early forecast of the 2008 Atlantic hurricane
season issued Friday by the Department of Atmospheric Science at
Colorado State University predicts 13 named storms, seven of which will
become hurricanes.
The forecasters further predicted that three of those seven hurricanes
will become “major” storms packing sustained winds of 111 mph or more.
The report puts the odds of a major hurricane striking the U.S. East
Coast at 60%, which is slightly higher than the 52% average over the
past century.
The Atlantic hurricane season runs from June 1 through Nov. 30.
In a statement, forecasters said that the forecast is based on a new
extended-range early December statistical prediction scheme that uses 58
years of data. The forecast also contains an analysis of all of the
department’s extended-range forecasts that have been issued over the
past 16 years.
Business Insurance - December 7, 2007
$20.5 Million Welder Verdict
Could Worry Insurers
Toxic exposure claims from welders became a bigger factor for insurers
when a federal jury in Ohio returned a $20.5 million verdict for a
welder who claimed he was made ill by the fumes from his work.
The Wednesday verdict illustrates that welder claims “belong on the
emerging risk radarscope as something insurers have to be aware of,”
said Robert P. Hartwig, president of the Insurance Information
Institute.
A statement for the five welding rod manufacturers, who were defendants
in the case, said they would appeal and defend themselves against
“baseless claims” and expect to be successful.
But David Shelton, a lawyer for plaintiff--Jeffery Tamraz, 51, of
Grant’s Pass, Ore.--characterized the case as a breakthrough and a
turning point for such suits.
The nine-member jury in Cleveland made its award against Lincoln
Electric, Hobard Brothers Company, ESAB Group Inc., TDY Industries and
BOC Group Inc., finding they had failed to properly warn against the
danger of manganese in their products.
In addition to the $17.5 million in compensatory damages for Mr. Tamraz,
the jury awarded another $3 million to his wife, Terry, for loss of
consortium. The defendants were not found liable for punitive damages or
fraudulent concealment.
National Underwriter - December 7, 2007
CGL POLICY COVERS NEGLIGENT
HIRING OF EMPLOYEE WHO ASSAULTED CUSTOMER; RESERVATION OF RIGHTS LETTER
INEFFECTIVE
NYAT Operating Corp. v. GAN Natl. Ins. Co. 2007 NY Slip Op 09675 Decided
on December 6, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department
This was a declaratory judgment action involving insurer GAN's
obligation to defend and indemnify plaintiff insured NYAT in an
underlying action in which Cabrera obtained a judgment against NYAT for
having negligently hired and retained an employee who sexually assaulted
her in the amount of $997,448. The Appellate Division affirmed an order
from Supreme Court, New York County in favor of the plaintiff.
"Because NYAT's liability in the underlying action was
based on its negligent hiring and retention of the employee, not
respondeat superior, the sexual assault was a covered 'accident' within
the meaning of the policy, and the exclusion for injuries expected or
intended from the standpoint of the insured does not apply (RJC Realty
Holding Corp. v Republic Franklin Ins. Co., 2 NY3d 158 [2004])."
Rogak Report -
December 7, 2007
COUNCIL OF INSURANCE BROKERS OF GREATER NY HONORS PAST
PRESIDENTS AND BESTOWS 2007 LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD ON
DONALD D. GABAY, ESQ.
Press Release
New York, NY, November 28, 2007—The Council of Insurance Brokers
of Greater New York (CIBGNY) honored its past Presidents on the
40th Anniversary of the Association and bestowed Donald D. Gabay,
Esq., of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan with its 2007 Lifetime
Achievement Award at the El Caribe Country Club, in Brooklyn,
NY, on November 16, 2007.
"Since the inception of the Association in 1966, CIBGNY is proud
to have had the best leadership in the insurance industry. I am
honored to be the President of this prestigious group,
especially on its 40th Anniversary. " said Peter N. Resnick,
President. "This organization has developed a sterling
reputation in the industry for its ability to help members
network and develop relationships with insurers and brokers."
"As an Association, we continue to advocate a high standard of
morality among members: to promote impartial treatment and trade
practices in the industry; to support positive relationships
among insurance companies, brokers and agents; and to take part
in the legislative processes within our industry. Resnick
continued, "Our past Presidents have helped ensure that the
Association stays on track with the issues that are of concern
to our clients and the insurance community."
Al Caputo of Buckingham Badler stated, "40 years is a milestone
in the history of the Association. As dinner chair, and past
President, I am even more honored to have had our former
Superintendent of the New York State Insurance Department, The
Honorable Greg Serio be on hand in honoring these insurance
leaders and installing our 2007/2008 Officers and Directors." He
continued, "It is through their direction and leadership that
the Association can continue its work over the coming years."
Those honored included: Anthony S. Calafiore, Apex Brokerage
Co.; Al Caputo, Buckingham Badler Associates; Jeffrey H.
Greenfield, NGL Financial Services; F. Michael Conte, Honig
Conte Porrino Insurance Agency; Howard I. Honig, Honig Conte
Porrino Insurance Agency; George A. Marchetti, Jr., Marchetti &
Sabatelli; Stuart Badler, Buckingham Badler Associates; Kenneth
Pollack; Ira Zapin; Paul Olshen, Dewitt Stern Imperatore; Alfred
Nussbaum; Steve Sabatelli; Thelma E. Goodrich, Goodrich Johnson
Agency and Donald D. Gabay, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan. A moment
of silence was also observed in honor of those past Presidents
who were deceased. They include George A. Marchetti, Sr.;
William R. Paris, Seymour Terry; Isaac M. Oberman, Ernest R.
Johnson and Alfred J. Rosse.
In addition, Donald G. Gabay, Esq., the Associations 4th
President and former First Deputy Superintendent of the NYSID
from 1978 - 1984 and Chief Counsel to the New York State
Assembly Committee on Insurance from 1975 - 1978, was bestowed
with CIBGNY's 2007 Lifetime Achievement Award. Dinner Chair Al
Caputo of Buckingham Badler said, "Don is an outstanding
businessman who is dedicated to the industry and his family. The
Council is proud to count him as a member and is especially
pleased to recognize his many achievements in the
industry—achievements that span more than a half of a century.
CIBGNY is a professional, independent insurance brokers
association in the New York City metropolitan area.
---------------------------------------------
Selected Opinions of the Office of
General Council
Report: Future Exposure to Coastal
Flood in Key Cities Worldwide
As many as 150 million people in the world’s major
cities could be reliant on flood defenses by 2070 – more than three
times the 40 million people today – as a result of climate change and
urban development, according to a major new study by the Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development) and jointly authored by Risk
Management Solutions (RMS) and leading academics from the University of
Southampton, the Tyndall Centre, Météo-France, and the Centre
International de Recherche sur l’Environnement et le Développement (CIRED).
The findings are from the first stage of the largest study on urban
coastal flood exposure ever undertaken. Over 130 key port cities
worldwide are analyzed to investigate the likely impact of climate
change alongside subsidence, population growth, and urban economic
development. The study focuses on the exposure of people, property, and
infrastructure to a 1-in-100 year flood event now and in the future, and
could have significant public policy implications for where to focus
adaptation strategies to climate extremes.
Property & infrastructure exposure
The cities with the highest value of property and infrastructure assets
exposed to coastal flooding caused by storm surge and damage from high
winds today are primarily in developed countries. The top 10 cities,
which contain 60 percent of the total exposure, are from only three
wealthy countries – the United States, Japan, and the Netherlands – with
Miami ranked at the top.
Miami remains at the top of the 2070 rankings, with exposed assets
rising from approximately $400 billion today to more than $3.5 trillion.
However, the rapid economic development expected in developing nations
means that in the future the highest exposure becomes more concentrated
in Asian cities, with eight of the top 10 situated in this region.
Guangzhou, China, is the second most exposed city in terms of assets,
followed by New York, Kolkata (Calcutta, India), Shanghai, Mumbai
(India), Tianjin (China), Tokyo, Hong Kong, and Bangkok, respectively.
“These findings deliver a clear message to businesses that invest, or
are planning to invest, in highly exposed cities to start implementing
pro-active risk management strategies that consider how risks will
evolve over time,” said Dr. Celine Herweijer, principal scientist of
future climate at RMS. “For the insurance industry, there is both an
opportunity and a necessity to promote adaptation. Crucially, rising
hazard does not have to translate into increased risk if the right
measures are taken.”
“Where risk is today privately insured, incentivizing adaptation amongst
policy-holders will serve as a double pay-back for insurers,” Herweijer
added. “Likewise, as insurers and business expand their business in
Asia, public and private investment in adaptation will be critical to
sustaining long-term financial stability.”
NAMIC - December 5,
2007
Latest Hot Co-op Topic:
Secondhand Smoke
Benjamin Zitomer lived happily with his family in a two-bedroom
apartment at 99 Jane St. in the West Village for six years before a new
tenant moved in next door and brought an unexpected menace: It wasn't
rats or cockroaches or even noise; it was secondhand smoke.
"It came in through the bedroom wall and permeated in through the front
door," Mr. Zitomer, 49, a database administrator, said. "Our apartment
was filled with smoke almost every night. We had to have the windows
open in the middle of the winter."
Secondhand smoke is overtaking noise as one of the most common
complaints coming before condo and co-op boards. While the issue isn't
new, real estate lawyers say that with New Yorkers prohibited from
smoking at work, in bars and restaurants, and even directly in front of
buildings, the battle against secondhand smoke is increasingly taking
place at home.
"This is the hot controversy in condos and co-ops right now," a real
estate lawyer who gets a new smoking-related case about once a month,
Aaron Shmulewitz, said. He added that with more science confirming the
dangers of secondhand smoke and fewer people picking up the smoking
habit, homeowners are more sensitive to the problem.
"We were really upset and frustrated," Mr. Zitomer said of his
experience. "We couldn't go out to escape it. My son had to go to sleep
just as it started up at night, and it lasted until 4 or 5 a.m. This guy
was something of a night owl."
The president of the board at 99 Jane St., Salvatore Rasa, declined to
comment. He said secondhand smoke "is an issue we are all learning
about."
For Mr. Zitomer, the problem wasn't so much the initial assault of the
smoke on him, his wife, and his 3-year old son as it was his lack of
legal recourse.
All told, it took him 10 months to resolve the issue — the condo board
eventually rejected the smoker's request to renew his lease when it came
up in August — but it could have dragged on for years.
The issue of secondhand smoke represents murky legal territory for
lawyers, with little case law on which to base a claim. Essentially,
condo and co-op boards must make a reasonable effort to determine the
source of the smoke and attempt to mitigate the effects. If they fail to
do that, homeowners and tenants can refuse to pay maintenance fees or
rent, Mr. Shmulewitz said.
"A board that ignores complaints like this is acting at its own peril,"
he said.
NY Sun - December 6, 2007
CSB Officials Encouraged with
Progress Announced Today by New York City in Revising its Outdated Fire
Code
The following statement was issued by the U.S. Chemical Safety Board in
response to the announcement by New York today of a proposed draft to
revise the city's fire code to include new provisions controlling
hazardous chemicals.
Statement of CSB Board Member and Interim Executive William E. Wright:
Four years ago, the Chemical Safety Board called upon New York City to
revise its nearly 90-year-old fire code to help prevent chemical
accidents and fires in the city.
Our safety recommendation followed a tragic explosion in a Chelsea
building in 2002. Dozens of people were injured, including New York
firefighters who were there to rescue survivors.
I am encouraged that New York City is proposing the adoption of an
updated model fire code that will better control the kinds of hazardous
materials that caused the Chelsea explosion and have the potential to
continue to threaten public safety.
This code is needed to control hazardous chemicals. I think the adoption
and use of a modern fire code will make New York a safer place to work
and live.
We would hope that other municipalities would follow suit and similarly
revise outdated fire codes that fail to address the use and storage of
hazardous chemicals.
Statement of Stephen Selk, PE, CSB Investigations Manager & Lead
Investigator in Kaltech investigation:
Our investigation concluded the accident that happened in New York
occurred when employees improperly mixed hazardous materials in the
basement of a building in Chelsea, and the investigation also found that
the New York City fire code did not adequately cover such hazards.
The CSB report called for labeling of hazardous materials, workers to be
trained in handling them, and the separation of incompatible chemicals.
The CSB also said businesses should be required to submit a hazardous
materials inventory and management plan prior to obtaining permits. The
Board further recommended that mixed-use buildings be required to
develop hazardous materials safety plans, to be shared with the
occupants. And the CSB recommended that the fire department and city
environmental authorities establish a program to exchange information
about hazardous chemicals stored at businesses. Revising the fire code
to include these recommendations will make New Yorkers safer.
Chemical
Safety Board - December 5, 2007
25% of NYC construction jobs are 'off
the books' At least 50,000 New York City construction jobs, or 25% of the total,
are part of the untaxed--and at times unsafe--underground
economy, according to a new report from the Fiscal Policy
Institute.
The study, the first comprehensive estimate of job numbers that
elude the usual government data-gathering methods, is based on
2005 figures and probably understates the true count by as much
as 15%, said James Parrott, author of the study and chief
economist of the New York research group. The institute defines
jobs as underground if they are misclassified as independent
contractor work or consist of employment by contractors who work
“off the books,’’ a segment that has boomed with the explosion
of residential construction in recent years.
The fiscal costs of the underground sector were $489 million in
2005 and likely to reach $557 million in 2008, the study said.
“Taxpayers are forced to pick up the tab for Social Security and
the other payroll taxes that go unpaid when construction workers
are hired off the books,” Mr. Parrott said. “And law-abiding
employers are put at a real disadvantage, forced to bear many
costs shifted to them from employers breaking the law.”
Costs fall into three categories: payroll taxes for Social
Security and Medicare and social insurance premiums covering
workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance and disability
insurance ($272 million in 2005); foregone income tax
collections ($70 million); and the shifted cost of employee
health care onto the workers themselves, taxpayers and other
employers ($148 million).
In addition to the fiscal cost, the underground construction
labor market puts workers at risk, the study said. Last year, 29
construction workers were killed on the job in New York City.
Half of the deaths occurred among workers at very small
construction firms and three-fourths of the workers were
employed by non-union companies.
CrainsNY - December 5, 2007
November P/C rates fall 15%:
MarketScout
Property/casualty insurance rates fell an average of 15% in November
compared to those of a year ago, Dallas-based MarketScout reported
Wednesday.
“General and excess liability rates decreased an additional 3% in
November to minus 18%,” said Richard Kerr, founder and chief executive
officer of the electronic insurance exchange, in a statement announcing
the results. “We believe the liability rate reductions might be driven
by the increased use of claims-made policies. We will continue to
research this hypothesis and report our findings.”
MarketScout also found that directors and officers liability pricing has
become more competitive, with D&O rates down 17% last month compared
with a year earlier.
Business Insurance - December 5, 2007
GOVERNOR SPITZER ANNOUNCES CONTRACT
WITH NATIONAL PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE ON UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE
State Selects Urban Institute to Help Develop
Strategic Roadmap
Governor Eliot Spitzer today announced that the Department of Health, in
partnership with the Insurance Department, will award a contract to the
Urban Institute to assist the state in developing a strategic roadmap
for achieving universal health insurance.
Earlier this year, the Governor announced his goal of ensuring that New
Yorkers have access to affordable coverage and high quality, cost
effective care. The Governor directed Health Commissioner Richard F.
Daines, M.D., and Insurance Superintendent Eric N. Dinallo to develop,
evaluate and recommend proposals for achieving universal coverage by
utilizing a building-block approach. The plan called for an incremental
effort that will draw from the experiences of other states, but will
ultimately result in a plan that is uniquely suited to New York’s
uninsured population and health care challenges.
“There is arguably no better use of state resources than making sure New
Yorkers are healthy,” said Governor Spitzer. “We expect to model
proposals that will enable us to reach that goal and avoid the
significant implementation problems that have plagued other state
efforts in this area. Few organizations have the wealth of knowledge and
expertise of the Urban Institute when it comes to assessing the cost and
coverage effects of health care reform proposals. We are confident that
the funds and mandate included in last year’s Budget will be well served
by the analytic work of the Urban Institute.”
The Urban Institute is a policy research organization that measures and
works to resolve societal problems, improve government decision-making,
evaluate social and economic programs and policy options and offer
technical assistance in policy and program development. The Institute
will model alternative proposals for achieving universal health coverage
in New York. The analysis will include, but may not be limited to,
proposals to provide universal health coverage through public and
private health coverage mechanisms.
Governor's News
Release - December 4, 2007
Deal reached to raise cash for
Executive Life
New York state insurance regulators have brokered a
deal that would raise enough cash from life insurance guaranty funds and
property/casualty insurers to offset a projected $2 billion deficit at
the insolvent Executive Life Insurance Co. of New York.
The deal would allow ELNY to make good on structured settlement
annuities issued to about 11,000 accident victims and others, New York
Gov. Eliot Spitzer and Insurance Superintendent Eric Dinallo announced.
ELNY, a former unit of the now-defunct First Executive Corp. of Los
Angeles, was ordered into rehabilitation by a New York court in 1991. An
affiliate, Executive Life Insurance Co. of California, also was ordered
liquidated in 1991 and California regulators later sold it to French
investors led by Altus Finance Group L.L.C.
Under the deal announced Tuesday, ELNY would receive roughly $650
million to $750 million in cash contributions, said Mark G. Peters,
deputy insurance superintendent in charge of the New York Liquidation
Bureau, which manages the ELNY rehabilitation.
The money will come from state life insurance guaranty associations—with
a “significant percentage” from Life Insurance Co. Guaranty Corp. of New
York—and from property/casualty insurers that bought ELNY annuities to
fund structured settlements of liability claims, Mr. Peters said.
If ELNY failed to make payments on these structured settlement
annuities, annuity holders would look to the property/casualty insurers
to pay their settlements, said Mr. Peters, explaining one motive for P/C
insurer participation
Business Insurance - December 4, 2007
Fitch Foresees P-C Sector
Loss By 2009
The property-casualty insurance industry should end 2007 with a fourth
year of double-digit returns on statutory capital, but the soft market
cycle could lead to a loss by 2009, Fitch Ratings said today.
Commenting on its review and outlook for the U.S. p-c industry for
2007-2008, Fitch Ratings analyst James B. Auden said while the sector
produced strong results in 2007, it is questionable whether the industry
will continue that strong performance past 2008.
The industry will likely see an underwriting loss in 2009, he said.
During a telephone conference call discussing the insurance industry
outlook, Mr. Auden said that after 2008 market conditions will show
deterioration and make underwriting discipline more difficult for
carriers as they seek market volume.
He said that insurers have enough cushion at the moment to weather the
cycle downturn and he did not see a change in the cycle for awhile,
which could lead to some carriers going back to bad underwriting
practices.
Mr. Auden said Fitch predicts a combined ratio of 92.7 for 2007, up from
91.6 in 2006. The trend forecast in 2008 will see a combined ratio
increase to 97.3.
In its report Fitch said the outlook for the p-c industry remains
stable, but a shift to a positive outlook “is difficult to envision over
the long term given the market’s inherent cyclicality.”
However, despite the softening, a shift to negative outlook is also
unlikely due to improvements in companies’ balance sheets and capital
positions.
Catastrophe losses for 2007 were light compared to the median loss over
15 years. Catastrophe losses are expected to be at $7.3 billion.
National Underwriter - December 4, 2007
N.Y. asks for 'reset' provision in
terror backstop
New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and New York City Mayor
Michael Bloomberg sent a letter Monday to congressional leaders asking
them to include a so-called “reset” provision in any legislation
designed to extend the federal terrorism insurance backstop.
The extension measure approved by the House contained such a provision,
but the Senate version does not.
The provision, which was drafted by Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y. would
provide lower deductibles for insurance companies that agree to write
terrorism coverage for areas that already have experienced terrorist
attacks, and would lower the thresholds at which the government would
provide the backstop to insurers for sites that suffer subsequent acts
of terrorism.
“As you know, New York City is our nation’s most densely populated area
and has suffered two severe terrorist attacks,” wrote the governor and
mayor in their letter to chairmen and ranking members of the Senate
Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee and the House Financial
Services Committee.
“As a result, many private insurers remain reluctant to provide a large
amount of terrorism coverage within the city, and many of our buildings
and large-scale redevelopment projects are unable to obtain sufficient
coverage. The ‘reset’ will provide a much-needed incentive for private
insurers to make capacity available in those areas where they otherwise
would not offer coverage due to the perceived high risk of terrorism.”
The backstop is slated to expire on Dec. 31. The Senate bill would
extend it for seven years; the House bill for 15 years.
Business Insurance - December 3, 2007
INSURANCE DEPARTMENT ISSUES
DRAFT WORKERS’ COMPENSATION MEDICAL TREATMENT GUIDELINES
State’s first guidelines designed to deliver quality, lower-cost care
for injured workers
Proposed medical treatment guidelines for treating workers injured on
the job will benefit those workers while helping to hold down the cost
of workers’ compensation insurance for all New Yorkers, New York State
Insurance Superintendent Eric Dinallo said today.
“Putting medical treatment guidelines in place will mean injured workers
get faster and more effective medical care at a lower cost to
employers,” Dinallo said. “These guidelines will standardize treatments
so injured workers get quality and appropriate care for their condition.
Without guidelines, disputes and inappropriate treatments can lead to
higher cost but not better care.”
Dinallo sent the State’s first ever medical treatment guidelines,
drafted as a result of the 2007 Workers’ Compensation Reform Act, to the
Workers’ Compensation Board today for its consideration in promulgating
regulations.
Previous reforms enacted in accordance with the Act have resulted in an
employer cost reduction for workers’ compensation of more than 20%, a
savings of about $1 billion per year, and encouraged new competition
among insurance companies in order to further reduce premiums. The
reforms are expected to reduce the time required to resolve disputed
workers’ compensation claims by more than half, getting benefits to
injured workers much more quickly.
The medical treatment guidelines were developed under the guidance of
the Department’s Workers’ Compensation Reform Task Force, headed by
Executive Director Bruce Topman and Project Manager Dr. Elain Sobol
Berger, working with representatives of labor, business and other state
agencies. The participants selected highly credentialed physicians and
other professionals to serve as essential advisors in the creation of
the guidelines, which express the consensus of the expert professionals.
The guidelines provide a consistent quality standard for the medical
care of injured workers. They are evidence-based and reflect the sound
clinical judgment of the physicians. These medical treatment guidelines
translate the medical literature into a usable and practical tool that
assists busy medical providers in the provision of appropriate health
care.
The guidelines focus on the treatment of injuries of the lower back,
cervical spine, knee and shoulder. The Workers’ Compensation Research
Institute recently reported these injuries account for nearly 60% of
total medical costs in New York’s system.
NY Insurance Department - December 3, 2007
A Warning About East Coast
Tsunamis
The risk is low. But the consequences could be high, with deadly waves
striking the coastal communities of Long Island, Connecticut and New
Jersey and killing thousands of people.
Today, the federal government is announcing that it has completed the
mid-Atlantic region’s risk assessments for the killer mounds of water
known as tsunamis, or tidal waves.
Scientists have long considered the West Coast of North America as the
side of the continent most likely to suffer earthquakes and the undersea
disturbances that raise tsunamis. But in recent years, with a growing
appreciation of the diverse origins of the giant waves and their
potential for havoc, experts have found new reasons for vigilance along
the East Coast.
“Tsunamis are a real threat,” said Lisa Taylor, an official at the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which is conducting the
assessments for coastal regions that are considered at risk. A main
factor is whether the land rises sharply or gently, the latter being
more prone to poundings from unexpectedly high waves.
The project creates elevation maps of coastal lands and adjacent
seafloors, helping scientists better forecast the areas that a tsunami
would flood. The giant waves can arise hundreds of miles away, in theory
giving emergency planners hours to send people to higher ground.
Part of the new analysis focuses on the easternmost area of Long Island,
including East Hampton and Southampton, and the southeastern coast of
Connecticut, including Mystic and Old Saybrook. The analysis also
evaluates the risk for Atlantic City.
A recent federal study found that a seaquake in a deep trench off Puerto
Rico could raise a tsunami that would travel for nearly five hours on
the ocean’s surface before crashing into Montauk, on the southeastern
tip of Long Island.
NY Times - December 3, 2007
Technology Allows Monitoring
Of Teen Drivers, Raising Questions - Finding a Balance Between Privacy
Rights And Preventing Unnecessary Accidents
Ever wanted to know what your teenage driver is doing with the car right
now? Technology that gives parents the answer is poised to make the jump
into the mainstream if some big car insurers can resolve worries about
privacy.
You might already be aware that a small number of auto insurance
companies are starting to offer systems that can monitor how a car is
being driven, either by capturing and transmitting digital data about
speed or location or capturing video of the driver. They are promoting
these systems to consumers as a way to keep tabs on a newly licensed
teenage driver.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Readers, over to you: Does monitoring teens' driving behavior violate
their privacy? Discuss.Some of these systems use GPS devices to gather
and transmit information about the vehicle's location and speed. Other
systems offer speed, location, braking and other data, plus video of the
driver and passengers. All of them speak directly to parents' fears
about their kids' shaky judgment behind the wheel. These fears are well
founded based on the statistics about teen drivers and accidents.
"The highest crash risk is when they first begin to drive without the
parent in the vehicle," says Anne McCartt, senior vice president for
research at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. "We do believe
these devices have potential in helping teens to learn safe driving
behaviors, and correct unsafe driving behavior faster than they would
otherwise."
In-vehicle monitoring systems have been in use for some time among truck
fleets and some company car fleets. The emergence of these virtual
back-seat driver systems to keep watch over teens is relatively recent,
but there are signs the concept is gaining momentum.
Last March, American Family Insurance of Madison, Wis., launched a
three-state test of what it calls the "Teen Safe Driver Program." In a
partnership with DriveCam Inc., a supplier of in-vehicle video
technology, American Family offered consumers a system that records
video of a driver's behavior and captured other data about the car's
behavior such as swerving or hard braking. In the case of say, a sudden,
sharp braking maneuver, the system stores video from 20 seconds
surrounding the event.
$$
Wall Street Journal - December 3, 2007
Albany Panel to Assess Health
Risks of Mold
It has been described by state lawmakers as posing an “unacceptable risk
to New York State’s health and environment.” It drove Bianca Jagger, the
former wife of Mick Jagger, from her Park Avenue apartment in 2003. It
forced hundreds of residents in Westbury, on Long Island, to begin
fleeing their apartment complex last week.
It is the scourge of tenants, landlords and homeowners alike, and now,
state officials and Gov. Eliot Spitzer are getting serious about it.
It is mold.
Tomorrow, the first meeting of the New York State Toxic Mold Task Force
will be held in Latham, N.Y., near Albany, at the headquarters of the
New York State Nurses Association. The meeting of the task force, the
first mold task force in the state, is an attempt by health officials
and medical experts to address what they describe as a growing but
little-recognized problem that has damaged property and affected the
health of tenants, homeowners and their children.
In August, a group of local and state officials, led by State Senator
Liz Krueger, a Manhattan Democrat, wrote to Governor Spitzer, urging him
to appoint the task force. It had been created by a law signed by Gov.
George E. Pataki in 2005, but had never been activated.
“Mold, some people are saying, is the new lead, which is a bad line, but
it is a reasonable analogy,” Ms. Krueger said.
In New York City, mold complaints to the city’s housing agency have
increased to roughly 21,000 in the 2007 fiscal year from 16,000 in the
2004 fiscal year. Mold complaints to the health department have also
jumped in recent years, and legal advocates for low-income tenants say
mold cases brought against landlords are increasingly commonplace in New
York City Housing Court.
But the nature and extent of the health problems mold has caused or
worsened in the city and around the state are largely unknown and open
to debate, and the legal requirements for properly ridding a unit or
building of excessive mold have yet to be established.
The goal of the Toxic Mold Task Force is to prepare a report to the
governor and the Legislature that examines what is known about toxic
mold, determines the magnitude of the problem in the state and looks
into the possibility of further action by the Legislature or state
agencies.
Think of mold, one expert on the subject explained, as a weed. They are
both equally ubiquitous: A little bit of mold grows everywhere, indoors
and outdoors, year round, primarily in warm, dark and damp locations.
There are thousands of different types of mold, but the one that has
received the most attention from the media and health officials in
recent years is Stachybotrys chartarum, a green-black mold that produces
what are known as mycotoxins and is often referred to as toxic mold.
For some people, exposure to mold causes hay fever-like symptoms, like
nasal stuffiness and wheezing. For others, including those who have mold
allergies or a compromised immune system, the reaction to mold exposure
can be more severe. Mold is also widely acknowledged to be a trigger for
asthma attacks.
NY
Times - December 3, 2007
Tom Bower's month's roundup of
recent interesting NY coverage law news
- how the results of a claim investigation were
defeated by the rule against hearsay;
- an insured that was hoist on its own petard
- whether an excess liability carrier could sue
defense counsel for legal malpractice.
Tom Bower's
Newsletter - December 2007
Officials Criticize Betting
on Death: Bill Could Prevent 'Stranger-Oriented Life Insurance'
Some investors are willing to bet that you're not going to live much
longer -- and they expect to get rich from your demise.
The Ohio Department of Insurance is warning seniors to
be wary of life insurance deals that companies in Ohio call a
"perversion of the purpose of life insurance." State lawmakers from both
parties want to stop the practice of allowing investors to bet on a
person's death through "stranger-oriented life insurance," called STOLI
arrangements.
"You have no idea who has an insurable interest in your life," said Rep.
Jay Hottinger, a Newark Republican sponsoring legislation to end such
investments. "I wouldn't feel too comfortable walking around not knowing
who's betting on me to die and wanting me to die."
Luring them with offers of free insurance or quick cash, the
arrangements are generally advertised to seniors ages 65 to 85,
particularly wealthier folks who can take out million-dollar-plus
policies.
For example, someone offers to pay your life-insurance premium for two
years. If you die during that time, your designated beneficiaries get
the money. If not, you can either repay the entire premium for those two
years, or the policy is taken over by investors who will collect when
you die.
Critics say the deals can leave seniors with less money than
anticipated, an unexpected tax liability or less ability to get more
life insurance. There's also concern that as more policies are cashed in
instead of lapsing, it could raise the cost of life insurance for all.
CNN talk-show host Larry King recently sued his insurance broker after
he sold off $10 million and $5 million policies for cash totaling $1.4
million. King said the company did not inform him of the fees and tax
ramifications or of the fact that it significantly reduced his ability
to buy more life insurance.
Industry Watch - December 1, 2007
S&P: Softening Prices Should
Start To Affect U.S. Commercial Lines Insurers
Another very profitable year for commercial lines insurers, sparked by
yet another exceptionally mild hurricane season, is emerging for the
entire U.S. property/casualty industry, says Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services.
An article recently published by S&P, "2008 U.S. Commercial Lines
Outlook: Earnings Still Strong, But Weaker Prices Should Start To Hit
Bottom Lines," says that unless there's a major negative surprise in
December 2007 earnings for commercial lines companies will approach the
record-level achieved in 2006. Balance-sheet strength for most insurers,
driven by higher statutory surplus and diminished concerns about reserve
adequacy, will also continue to improve.
"Still, we are not popping champagne corks just yet," S&P says. "As 2007
has progressed, we have noted with increasing concern the rate
deterioration across virtually all business lines. Although the absolute
level of rate decline varies substantially by source -- with insurance
intermediaries suggesting higher average rate declines than are the
insurers themselves or insurance buyers -- one thing they do agree on is
that the rate of deterioration is accelerating. Although companies are
still reporting strong underwriting results, in large part because of
another exceptionally low year for hurricane losses and the decline in
adverse prior-year reserve development, we believe that the margin
compression on business written in 2007 will become more evident in
2008."
Insurance Journal - November 30, 2007
Insurance Agency Liable for
Breach of Contract for Failure to Provide Promised Coverage; If an Agent
of the Carrier, Insurer May be Liable as Well
Bedessee Imports, Inc., v. Cook, Hall & Hyde,
Inc., and Kemper Ins. Co. Appellate Division, Second Department
An insurance agent or broker such as CHH may be held
liable under theories of breach of contract or negligence for failing to
procure insurance either by proof that it breached the agreement or
because it failed to exercise due care in the transaction. Here, such
proof was established and CCH, the agent, failed to offer contrary
proof. CCH claimed that it was acting as an agent for Kemper, a
disclosed principal but that doesn’t free the agent of liability. CCH
argued that it issued a binder pursuant to authority but such a
temporary policy terminates when the insurer issues a policy or decides
not to do so. Here there was proof that Kemper refused to issue the
policy. Issues of fact exist, however, as to whether Kemper is liable
for the agent’s conduct .
Hurwitz & Fine - November 30, 2007
Selected Opinions of the Office of
General Council
Insurance Department - November 30, 2007
|
|
. News
Archive
November, 2007
October 1-31, 2007
September 1-30, 2007
August 1-31,2007
July 1.31.2007
June 1-30, 2007
May 1-31, 2007
April 1-30, 2007
March 1-31, 2007
February 1-28, 2007
January 1-31, 2007
December 16-31, 2007
December 1-15, 2006
November, 2006
October, 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 16-31,2006
May 1-15, 2006
April 1-30, 2006
March 16-30, 2006
March 1-15, 2006
February 16-28, 2006
February 1-15, 2006
January 16-31, 2006
January 1-15,
2006
December 16-31,
2006
December 1-15,
2005
November 16-30, 2005
November 1-15, 2005
October 16-31, 2005
October 1-15, 2005
September 16-30, 2005
September 1-15, 2005
August 16-31, 2005
August 1-15, 2005
July 16-31, 2005
July 1-15, 2005
June 16-30, 2005
June 1-15, 2005
May 16-31, 2005
May 1-15, 2005
Apr 16-30, 3005
April 1-15, 2005
March 16-31, 2005
March 1-15, 2005
February 15-28, 2005
February 1-14, 2005
January 16-31, 2005
January 1-15, 2005
|